Paper detail

Peaks Sets of Classical Coxeter Groups

We say a permutation $π=π_1π_2\cdotsπ_n$ in the symmetric group $\mathfrak{S}_n$ has a peak at index $i$ if $π_{i-1}<π_i>π_{i+1}$ and we let $P(π)=\{i \in \{1, 2, \ldots, n\} \, \vert \, \mbox{$i$ is a peak of $π$}\}$. Given a set $S$ of positive integers, we let $P (S; n)$ denote the subset of $\mathfrak{S}_n$ consisting of all permutations $π$, where $P(π) =S$. In 2013, Billey, Burdzy, and Sagan proved $|P(S;n)| = p(n)2^{n-\lvert S\rvert-1}$, where $p(n)$ is a polynomial of degree $\max(S)- 1$. In 2014, Castro-Velez et al. considered the Coxeter group of type $B_n$ as the group of signed permutations on $n$ letters and showed that $\lvert P_B(S;n)\rvert=p(n)2^{2n-|S|-1}$ where $p(n)$ is the same polynomial of degree $\max(S)-1$. In this paper we partition the sets $P(S;n) \subset \mathfrak{S}_n$ studied by Billey, Burdzy, and Sagan into subsets of $P(S;n)$ of permutations with peak set $S$ that end with an ascent to a fixed integer $k$ or a descent and provide polynomial formulas for the cardinalities of these subsets. After embedding the Coxeter groups of Lie type $C_n$ and $D_n$ into $\mathfrak{S}_{2n}$, we partition these groups into bundles of permutations $π_1π_2 \cdotsπ_n|π_{n+1}\cdots π_{2n}$ such that $π_1π_2\cdots π_n$ has the same relative order as some permutation $σ_1σ_2\cdotsσ_n \in \mathfrak{S}_n$. This allows us to count the number of permutations in types $C_n$ and $D_n$ with a given peak set $S$ by reducing the enumeration to calculations in the symmetric group and sums across the rows of Pascal's triangle.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.