Paper detail

Path Conditions and Principal Matching: A New Approach to Access Control

Traditional authorization policies are user-centric, in the sense that authorization is defined, ultimately, in terms of user identities. We believe that this user-centric approach is inappropriate for many applications, and that what should determine authorization is the relationships that exist between entities in the system. While recent research has considered the possibility of specifying authorization policies based on the relationships that exist between peers in social networks, we are not aware of the application of these ideas to general computing systems. We develop a formal access control model that makes use of ideas from relationship-based access control and a two-stage method for evaluating policies. Our policies are defined using path conditions, which are similar to regular expressions. We define semantics for path conditions, which we use to develop a rigorous method for evaluating policies. We describe the algorithm required to evaluate policies and establish its complexity. Finally, we illustrate the advantages of our model using an example and describe a preliminary implementation of our algorithm.

preprint2014arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.