Paper detail

Partitioned Cross-Validation for Divide-and-Conquer Density Estimation

We present an efficient method to estimate cross-validation bandwidth parameters for kernel density estimation in very large datasets where ordinary cross-validation is rendered highly inefficient, both statistically and computationally. Our approach relies on calculating multiple cross-validation bandwidths on partitions of the data, followed by suitable scaling and averaging to return a partitioned cross-validation bandwidth for the entire dataset. The partitioned cross-validation approach produces substantial computational gains over ordinary cross-validation. We additionally show that partitioned cross-validation can be statistically efficient compared to ordinary cross-validation. We derive analytic expressions for the asymptotically optimal number of partitions and study its finite sample accuracy through a detailed simulation study. We additionally propose a permuted version of partitioned cross-validation which attains even higher efficiency. Theoretical properties of the estimators are studied and the methodology is applied to the Higgs Boson dataset with 11 million observations

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.