Paper detail

Particle-number projected Bogoliubov coupled cluster theory. Application to the pairing Hamiltonian

While coupled cluster theory accurately models weakly correlated quantum systems, it often fails in the presence of strong correlations where the standard mean-field picture is qualitatively incorrect. In many cases, these failures can be largely ameliorated by permitting the mean-field reference to break physical symmetries. Symmetry-broken coupled cluster, e.g. Bogoliubov coupled cluster, theory can indeed provide reasonably accurate energetic predictions, but the broken symmetry can compromise the quality of the resulting wave function and predictions of observables other than the energy. Merging symmetry projection and coupled cluster theory is therefore an appealing way to describe strongly correlated systems. Independently, two different but related formalisms have been recently proposed to achieve this goal. The two formalisms are contrasted in this manuscript, with results tested on the Richardson pairing Hamiltonian. Both formalisms are based on the disentangled cluster representation of the symmetry-rotated coupled cluster wavefunction. However, they differ in the way that the disentangled clusters are solved. One approach sets up angle-dependent coupled cluster equations, while the other involves first-order ordinary differential equations. The latter approach yields energies and occupation probabilities significantly better than those of number-projected BCS and BCS coupled cluster and, when the disentangled clusters are truncated at low excitation levels, has a computational cost not too much larger than that of BCS coupled cluster. The high quality of results presented in this manuscript indicates that symmetry-projected coupled cluster is a promising method that can accurately describe both weakly and strongly correlated finite many-fermion systems.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.