Paper detail

Partial wave analysis of pbar-p annihilation channels in flight with I=1, C=+1

A combined analysis is reported of 3pizero, pizero-eta and pizero-etaprime data in the mass range 1960 to 2410 MeV. This analysis is made consistent also with eta-eta-pizero data, reported separately. The analysis requires s-channel resonances with a spectrum close to that published earlier for C = +1 states with I = 0; masses for I=1 states are lower on average by 20 MeV. Two alternative solutions are found, differing only for J^P = 2^+ and 4^+ states by small amounts in masses and widths. Both 3pizero and eta-pizero data prefer one of these two solutions. For this preferred solution, observed states have J^PC, masses and widths (M,Gamma) in MeV as follows: 4^-+: (2250+-15, 215+-25), 4^++: (2255+-40, 330 ^{+110}_{-50}) and (2005 ^{+25}_{-45}, 180+-30), 3^++: (2275+-35, 350 ^{+100}_{-50}) and (2031+-12, 150 \pm 18), 2^-+: (2245+-60, 320 ^{+100}_{-40}) and (2005+-15, 200+-40, 2^++: (2255+-20, 230+-15), (2175+-40, 310^{+90}_{-45}) and (2030+-20, 205+-30), and 1^++: (2270 ^{+55}_{-40}, 305 ^{+70}_{-35}). There are indications of further 2^-+, 2^++ and 1^++ contributions just below the available mass range, and also a 0^++ state at ~2025 MeV.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access8 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.