Paper detail

Partial exchangeability of the prior via shuffling

In inference problems involving a multi-dimensional parameter $θ$, it is often natural to consider decision rules that have a risk which is invariant under some group $G$ of permutations of $θ$. We show that this implies that the Bayes risk of the rule is {\em as if} the prior distribution of the parameter is partially exchangeable with respect to $G$. We provide a symmetrization technique for incorporating partial exchangeability of $θ$ into a statistical model, without assuming any other prior information. We refer to this technique as {\em shuffling}. Shuffling can be viewed as an instance of empirical Bayes, where we estimate the (unordered) multiset of parameter values $\{θ_1,θ_2,\dots,θ_p\}$ while using a uniform prior on $G$ for their ordering. Estimation of the multiset is a missing data problem which can be tackled with a stochastic EM algorithm. We show that in the special case of estimating the mean-value parameter in a regular exponential family model, shuffling leads to an estimator that is a weighted average of permuted versions of the usual maximum likelihood estimator. This is a novel form of shrinkage.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.