Paper detail

Parity-to-charge conversion for readout of topological Majorana qubits

We theoretically study a scheme to distinguish the two ground states of a one-dimensional topological superconductor, which could serve as a basis for the readout of Majorana qubits. The scheme is based on parity-to-charge conversion, i.e., the ground-state parity of the superconductor is converted to the charge occupation on a tunnel-coupled auxiliary quantum dot. We describe how certain error mechanisms degrade the quality of the parity-to-charge conversion process. We consider (i) leakage due to a strong readout tunnel pulse, (ii) incomplete charge Rabi oscillations due to slow charge noise, and (iii) charge relaxation due to phonon emission and absorption. To describe these effects, we use simple model Hamiltonians based on the ideal Kitaev chain, and draw conclusions to generic one-dimensional topological superconductors wherever possible. In general, the effects of the error mechanisms can be minimized by choosing a smooth shape and an optimal strength for the readout tunnel pulse. In a case study based on InAs heterostructure device parameters, we estimate that the parity-to-charge conversion error is mainly due to slow charge noise for weak tunnel pulses and leakage for strong tunnel pulses.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.