Parametric RDT approach to computational gap of symmetric binary perceptron

preprint2026arXivOpen access

Abstract

We study potential presence of statistical-computational gaps (SCG) in symmetric binary perceptrons (SBP) via a parametric utilization of \emph{fully lifted random duality theory} (fl-RDT) [96]. A structural change from decreasingly to arbitrarily ordered cc-sequence (a key fl-RDT parametric component) is observed on the second lifting level and associated with \emph{satisfiability} (αcα_c) -- \emph{algorithmic} (αaα_a) constraints density threshold change thereby suggesting a potential existence of a nonzero computational gap SCG=αc−αaSCG=α_c-α_a. The second level estimate is shown to match the theoretical αcα_c whereas the r→∞r\rightarrow \infty level one is proposed to correspond to αaα_a. For example, for the canonical SBP (κ=1κ=1 margin) we obtain αc≈1.8159α_c\approx 1.8159 on the second and αa≈1.6021α_a\approx 1.6021 (with converging tendency towards ∼1.59\sim 1.59 range) on the seventh level. Our propositions remarkably well concur with recent literature: (i) in [20] local entropy replica approach predicts αLE≈1.58α_{LE}\approx 1.58 as the onset of clustering defragmentation (presumed driving force behind locally improving algorithms failures); (ii) in α→0α\rightarrow 0 regime we obtain on the third lifting level κ≈1.2385αa−log⁡(αa)κ\approx 1.2385\sqrt{\frac{α_a}{-\log\left ( α_a \right ) }} which qualitatively matches overlap gap property (OGP) based predictions of [43] and identically matches local entropy based predictions of [24]; (iii) cc-sequence ordering change phenomenology mirrors the one observed in asymmetric binary perceptron (ABP) in [98] and the negative Hopfield model in [100]; and (iv) as in [98,100], we here design a CLuP based algorithm whose practical performance closely matches proposed theoretical predictions.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.