Paper detail

Parametric inference and forecasting in continuously invertible volatility models

We introduce the notion of continuously invertible volatility models that relies on some Lyapunov condition and some regularity condition. We show that it is almost equivalent to the ability of the volatilities forecasting using the parametric inference approach based on the SRE given in [16]. Under very weak assumptions, we prove the strong consistency and the asymptotic normality of the parametric inference. Based on this parametric estimation, a natural strongly consistent forecast of the volatility is given. We apply successfully this approach to recover known results on univariate and multivariate GARCH type models and to the EGARCH(1,1) model. We prove the strong consistency of the forecasting as soon as the model is invertible and the asymptotic normality of the parametric inference as soon as the limiting variance exists. Finally, we give some encouraging empirical results of our approach on simulations and real data.

preprint2011arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.