Paper detail

Parameterizing the surface free energy and excess adsorption of a hard-sphere fluid at a planar hard wall

he inhomogeneous structure of a fluid at a wall can be characterized in several ways. Within a thermodynamic description the surface free energy $γ$ and the excess adsorption $Γ$ are of central importance. For theoretical studies closed expression of $γ$ and $Γ$ can be very valuable; however, even for a well-studied model system such as a hard-sphere fluid at a planar hard wall, the accuracy of existing expressions for $γ$ and $Γ$, compared to precise computer simulation data, can still be improved. Here, we compare several known expressions for $γ$ and $Γ$ to the most precise computer simulation data. While good agreement is generally found at low to intermediate fluid densities, the existing parameterizations show significant deviation at high density. In this work, we propose new parameterizations for $γ$ and $Γ$ that agree with the simulation data within statistical error over the entire fluid density range.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.