Paper detail

Parameter Estimation for a partially observed Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process with long-memory noise

\noindent \textbf{Abstract}: We consider the parameter estimation problem for the Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process $X$ driven by a fractional Ornstein-Uhlenbeck process $V$, i.e. the pair of processes defined by the non-Markovian continuous-time long-memory dynamics $dX_{t}=-θX_{t}dt+dV_{t};\ t\geq 0$, with $dV_{t}=-ρV_{t}dt+dB_{t}^{H};\ t\geq 0$, where $θ>0$ and $ρ>0$ are unknown parameters, and $B^{H}$ is a fractional Brownian motion of Hurst index $H\in (\frac{1}{2},1)$. We study the strong consistency as well as the asymptotic normality of the joint least squares estimator $(\hatθ_{T},\widehat{ρ}% _{T}) $ of the pair $( θ,ρ) $, based either on continuous or discrete observations of $\{X_{s};\ s\in \lbrack 0,T]\}$ as the horizon $T$ increases to +$\infty $. Both cases qualify formally as partial-hbobservation questions since $V$ is unobserved. In the latter case, several discretization options are considered. Our proofs of asymptotic normality based on discrete data, rely on increasingly strict restrictions on the sampling frequency as one reduces the extent of sources of observation. The strategy for proving the asymptotic properties is to study the case of continuous-time observations using the Malliavin calculus, and then to exploit the fact that each discrete-data estimator can be considered as a perturbation of the continuous one in a mathematically precise way, despite the fact that the implementation of the discrete-time estimators is distant from the continuous estimator. In this sense, we contend that the continuous-time estimator cannot be implemented in practice in any naïve way, and serves only as a mathematical tool in the study of the discrete-time estimators' asymptotics.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.