Paper detail

Parallel Performance of ARM ThunderX2 for Atomistic Simulation Algorithms

Atomistic simulation drives scientific advances in modern material science and accounts for a significant proportion of wall time on High Performance Computing facilities. It is important that algorithms are efficient and implementations are performant in a continuously diversifying hardware landscape. Furthermore, they have to be portable to make best use of the available computing resource. In this paper we assess the parallel performance of some key algorithms implemented in a performance portable framework developed by us. We consider Molecular Dynamics with short range interactions, the Fast Multipole Method and Kinetic Monte Carlo. To assess the performance of emerging architectures, we compare the Marvell ThunderX2 (ARM) architecture to traditional x86_64 hardware made available through the Azure cloud computing service.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.