Paper detail

Parallel Pairwise Correlation Computation On Intel Xeon Phi Clusters

Co-expression network is a critical technique for the identification of inter-gene interactions, which usually relies on all-pairs correlation (or similar measure) computation between gene expression profiles across multiple samples. Pearson's correlation coefficient (PCC) is one widely used technique for gene co-expression network construction. However, all-pairs PCC computation is computationally demanding for large numbers of gene expression profiles, thus motivating our acceleration of its execution using high-performance computing. In this paper, we present LightPCC, the first parallel and distributed all-pairs PCC computation on Intel Xeon Phi (Phi) clusters. It achieves high speed by exploring the SIMD-instruction-level and thread-level parallelism within Phis as well as accelerator-level parallelism among multiple Phis. To facilitate balanced workload distribution, we have proposed a general framework for symmetric all-pairs computation by building bijective functions between job identifier and coordinate space for the first time. We have evaluated LightPCC and compared it to two CPU-based counterparts: a sequential C++ implementation in ALGLIB and an implementation based on a parallel general matrix-matrix multiplication routine in Intel Math Kernel Library (MKL) (all use double precision), using a set of gene expression datasets. Performance evaluation revealed that with one 5110P Phi and 16 Phis, LightPCC runs up to $20.6\times$ and $218.2\times$ faster than ALGLIB, and up to $6.8\times$ and $71.4\times$ faster than single-threaded MKL, respectively. In addition, LightPCC demonstrated good parallel scalability in terms of number of Phis. Source code of LightPCC is publicly available at http://lightpcc.sourceforge.net.

preprint2016arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.