Paper detail

Parallel Galton Watson Process

In this paper, we study a parallel version of Galton-Watson processes for the random generation of tree-shaped structures. Random trees are useful in many situations (testing, binary search, simulation of physics phenomena,...) as attests more than 49000 citations on Google scholar. Using standard analytic combinatorics, we first give a theoretical, average-case study of the random process in order to evaluate how parallelism can be extracted from this process, and we deduce a parallel generation algorithm. Then we present how it can be implemented in a task-based parallel paradigm for shared memory (here, Intel Cilk). This implementation faces several challenges, among which efficient, thread-safe random bit generation, memory management and algorithmic modifications for small-grain parallelism. Finally, we evaluate the performance of our implementation and the impact of different choices and parameters. We obtain a significant efficiency improvement for the generation of big trees. We also conduct empirical and theoretical studies of the average behaviour of our algorithm.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.