Paper detail

Paired spiking robustly shapes spontaneous activity in neural networks in vitro

In vivo, neurons establish functional connections and preserve information along their synaptic pathways from one information processing stage to the next in a very efficient manner. Paired spiking (PS) enhancement plays a key role by acting as a temporal filter that deletes less informative spikes. We analyzed the spontaneous neural activity evolution in a hippocampal and a cortical network over several weeks exploring whether the same PS coding mechanism appears in neuronal cultures as well. We show that self-organized neural in vitro networks not only develop characteristic bursting activity, but feature robust in vivo-like PS activity. PS activity formed spatiotemporal patterns that started at early days in vitro (DIVs) and lasted until the end of the recording sessions. Initially random-like and sparse PS patterns became robust after three weeks in vitro (WIVs). They were characterized by a high number of occurrences and short inter-paired spike intervals (IPSIs). Spatially, the degree of complexity increased by recruiting new neighboring sites in PS as a culture matured. Moreover, PS activity participated in establishing functional connectivity between different sites within the developing network. Employing transfer entropy (TE) as an information transfer measure, we show that PS activity is robustly involved in establishing effective connectivities. Spiking activity at both individual sites and network level robustly followed each PS within a short time interval. PS may thus be considered a spiking predictor. These findings suggest that PS activity is preserved in spontaneously active in vitro networks as part of a robust coding mechanism as encountered in vivo. We suggest that, presumably in lack of any external sensory stimuli, PS may act as an internal surrogate stimulus to drive neural activity at different developmental stages.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.