Paper detail

Painlevé VI and the Unitary Jacobi ensembles

The six Painlevé transcendants which originally appeared in the studies of ordinary differential equations have been found numerous applications in physical problems. The well-known examples among which include symmetry reduction of the Ernst equation which arises from stationary axial symmetric Einstein manifold and the spin-spin correlation functions of the two-dimensional Ising model in the work of McCoy, Tracy and Wu. The problem we study in this paper originates from random matrix theory, namely, the smallest eigenvalues distribution of the finite $n$ Jacobi unitary ensembles which was first investigated by Tracy and Widom. This is equivalent to the computation of the probability that the spectrum is free of eigenvalues on the interval $[0,t]$. Such ensembles also appears in multivariate statistics known as the double-Wishart distribution. We consider a more general model where the Jacobi weight is perturbed by a discontinuous factor and study the associated finite Hankel determinant. It is shown that the logarithmic derivative of Hankel determinant satisfies a particular $σ-$form of Painlevé VI, which holds for the gap probability as well. We also compute exactly the leading term of the gap probability as $t\to 1^-$.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.