Paper detail

Out-of-the-box channel pruned networks

In the last decade convolutional neural networks have become gargantuan. Pre-trained models, when used as initializers are able to fine-tune ever larger networks on small datasets. Consequently, not all the convolutional features that these fine-tuned models detect are requisite for the end-task. Several works of channel pruning have been proposed to prune away compute and memory from models that were trained already. Typically, these involve policies that decide which and how many channels to remove from each layer leading to channel-wise and/or layer-wise pruning profiles, respectively. In this paper, we conduct several baseline experiments and establish that profiles from random channel-wise pruning policies are as good as metric-based ones. We also establish that there may exist profiles from some layer-wise pruning policies that are measurably better than common baselines. We then demonstrate that the top layer-wise pruning profiles found using an exhaustive random search from one datatset are also among the top profiles for other datasets. This implies that we could identify out-of-the-box layer-wise pruning profiles using benchmark datasets and use these directly for new datasets. Furthermore, we develop a Reinforcement Learning (RL) policy-based search algorithm with a direct objective of finding transferable layer-wise pruning profiles using many models for the same architecture. We use a novel reward formulation that drives this RL search towards an expected compression while maximizing accuracy. Our results show that our transferred RL-based profiles are as good or better than best profiles found on the original dataset via exhaustive search. We then demonstrate that if we found the profiles using a mid-sized dataset such as Cifar10/100, we are able to transfer them to even a large dataset such as Imagenet.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.