Paper detail

Orthorhombic $ABC$ semiconductors as antiferroelectrics

We use a first-principles rational-design approach to identify a previously-unrecognized class of antiferroelectric materials in the $Pnma$ MgSrSi structure type. The MgSrSi structure type can be described in terms of antipolar distortions of the nonpolar $P6_{3}/mmc$ ZrBeSi structure type, and we find many members of this structure type are close in energy to the related polar $P6_{3}mc$ LiGaGe structure type, which includes many members we predict to be ferroelectric. We highlight known $ABC$ combinations in which this energy difference is comparable to the antiferroelectric-ferroelectric switching barrier of PbZrO$_{3}$. We calculate structural parameters and relative energies for all three structure types, both for reported and as-yet hypothetical representatives of this class. Our results provide guidance for the experimental realization and further investigation of high-performance materials suitable for practical applications.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.