Paper detail

Origin of a sensitive dependence of calculated $ββ$-decay amplitudes on the particle-particle residual interaction

In the present work the sensitivity of the QRPA calculation results to a realistic residual interaction is analyzed in the framework of the approach of Refs. \cite{Rum98,Rodin05}. Both Gamow-Teller (GT) and Fermi (F) \bb-decay amplitudes $M^{2ν}$, along with the corresponding energy-weighted sum rules $S$, are calculated. General expressions relating $S$ to a realistic residual particle-particle interaction are derived, which show a pronounced sensitivity of $S$ to the singlet-channel interaction in the case of F transitions, and to the triplet-channel interaction in the case of GT transitions. Decompositions of $M^{2ν}$, as well as the monopole transition contributions to $M^{0ν}$, are obtained by the method of Refs. \cite{Rum98,Rodin05}. It is shown that in most of the cases almost the whole dependence of $M^{2ν}$ and $M^{0ν}$ on the particle-particle renormalization parameter $g_{pp}$ is accounted for by the $g_{pp}$-dependence of the corresponding sum rules $S$. Thus, the $g_{pp}$-sensitivity of calculated $M^{2ν}$ and $M^{0ν}$ is unavoidable since it is dictated by the generic structure of the $ββ$ amplitudes. Finally, a better isospin-consistent way of a renormalization of the realistic residual particle-particle interaction to use in QRPA calculations is suggested.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.