Paper detail

Ordering kinetics in q-state clock model: scaling properties and growth laws

We present a comprehensive Monte Carlo study of the ordering kinetics in the $d=2$ ferromagnetic $q$-state clock model with nonconserved Glauber dynamics. In agreement with previous studies we find that $q \geqslant 5$ is characterized by two phase transitions occurring at temperatures $T_{c}^1$ and $T_{c}^2$ ($T_{c}^2<T_{c}^1$). Phase ordering kinetics is then investigated by rapidly quenching the system in two phases, in the quasi-long range ordered phase (QLRO) where $T_{c}^2<T<T_{c}^1$ and in the long-range ordered phase (LRO) where $T<T_{c}^2$; $T$ being the quench temperature. Our numerical data for equal time spatial correlation function $C(\textbf{r},t)$ and structure factor $S(k,t)$ support dynamical scaling. Quench in the LRO regime is characterized by a crossover from a preasymptotic growth driven by the annealing of both vortices and interfaces to an interface driven growth at the asymptotic regime with growth exponent $n\simeq 0.5$. In the QLRO quench regime, domains coarsen mainly via annihilation of point defects and our length scale data for $q$ = 9, 12, and 20 suggests a $R(t) \sim (t/\ln t)^{1/2}$ growth law for the $q$-state clock model in the QLRO phase.

preprint2018arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.