Paper detail

Orbifolds as microlinear types in synthetic differential cohesive homotopy type theory

Informally, an orbifold is a smooth space whose points may have finitely many internal symmetries. Formally, however, the notion of orbifold has been presented in a number of different guises -- from Satake's V-manifolds to Moerdijk and Pronk's proper étale groupoids -- which do not on their face resemble the informal definition. The reason for this divergence between formalism and intuition is that the points of spaces cannot have internal symmetries in traditional, set-level foundations. The extra data of these symmetries must be carried around and accounted for throughout the theory. More drastically, maps between orbifolds presented in the usual ways cannot be defined pointwise. In this paper, we will put forward a definition of orbifold in synthetic differential cohesive homotopy type theory: an orbifold is a microlinear type for which the type of identifications between any two points is properly finite. In homotopy type theory, a point of a type may have internal symmetries, and we will be able to construct examples of orbifolds by defining their type of points directly. Moreover, the mapping space between two orbifolds is merely the type of functions. We will justify this synthetic definition by proving, internally, that every proper étale groupoid is an orbifold. In this way, we will show that the synthetic theory faithfully extends the usual theory of orbifolds. Along the way, we will investigate the microlinearity of higher types such as étale groupoids, showing that the methods of synthetic differential geometry generalize gracefully to higher analogues of smooth spaces. We will also investigate the relationship between the Dubuc-Penon and open-cover definitions of compactness in synthetic differential geometry, and show that any discrete, Dubuc-Penon compact subset of a second-countable manifold is subfinitely enumerable.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.