BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

David Jaz Myers

David Jaz Myers contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.CTmath.ATmath.LOLogic in Computer Sciencemath.DGmath.DS

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - EmergingVerification L1Unclaimed author
8works
0followers
6topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

8 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Good Fibrations through the Modal Prism

Homotopy type theory is a formal language for doing abstract homotopy theory -- the study of identifications. But in unmodified homotopy type theory, there is no way to say that these identifications come from identifying the path-connected points of a space. In other words, we can do abstract homotopy theory, but not algebraic topology. Shulman's Real Cohesive HoTT remedies this issue by introducing a system of modalities that relate the spatial structure of types to their homotopical structure. In this paper, we develop a theory of modal fibrations for a general modality, and apply it in particular to the shape modality of Real Cohesion. We then give examples of modal fibrations in Real Cohesive HoTT, and develop the theory of covering spaces.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Orbifolds as microlinear types in synthetic differential cohesive homotopy type theory

Informally, an orbifold is a smooth space whose points may have finitely many internal symmetries. Formally, however, the notion of orbifold has been presented in a number of different guises -- from Satake's V-manifolds to Moerdijk and Pronk's proper étale groupoids -- which do not on their face resemble the informal definition. The reason for this divergence between formalism and intuition is that the points of spaces cannot have internal symmetries in traditional, set-level foundations. The extra data of these symmetries must be carried around and accounted for throughout the theory. More drastically, maps between orbifolds presented in the usual ways cannot be defined pointwise. In this paper, we will put forward a definition of orbifold in synthetic differential cohesive homotopy type theory: an orbifold is a microlinear type for which the type of identifications between any two points is properly finite. In homotopy type theory, a point of a type may have internal symmetries, and we will be able to construct examples of orbifolds by defining their type of points directly. Moreover, the mapping space between two orbifolds is merely the type of functions. We will justify this synthetic definition by proving, internally, that every proper étale groupoid is an orbifold. In this way, we will show that the synthetic theory faithfully extends the usual theory of orbifolds. Along the way, we will investigate the microlinearity of higher types such as étale groupoids, showing that the methods of synthetic differential geometry generalize gracefully to higher analogues of smooth spaces. We will also investigate the relationship between the Dubuc-Penon and open-cover definitions of compactness in synthetic differential geometry, and show that any discrete, Dubuc-Penon compact subset of a second-countable manifold is subfinitely enumerable.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Behavioral Mereology: A Modal Logic for Passing Constraints

Mereology is the study of parts and the relationships that hold between them. We introduce a behavioral approach to mereology, in which systems and their parts are known only by the types of behavior they can exhibit. Our discussion is formally topos-theoretic, and agnostic to the topos, providing maximal generality; however, by using only its internal logic we can hide the details and readers may assume a completely elementary set-theoretic discussion. We consider the relationship between various parts of a whole in terms of how behavioral constraints are passed between them, and give an inter-modal logic that generalizes the usual alethic modalities in the setting of symmetric accessibility.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Cartesian Factorization Systems and Grothendieck Fibrations

Every Grothendieck fibration gives rise to a vertical/cartesian orthogonal factorization system on its domain. We define a cartesian factorization system to be an orthogonal factorization in which the left class satisfies 2-of-3 and is closed under pullback along the right class. We endeavor to show that this definition abstracts crucial features of the vertical/cartesian factorization system associated to a Grothendieck fibration, and give comparisons between various 2-categories of factorization systems and Grothendieck fibrations to demonstrate this relationship. We then give a construction which corresponds to the fiberwise opposite of a Grothendieck fibration on the level of cartesian factorization systems. Apart from the final double categorical results, this paper is entirely review of previously established material. It should be read as an expository note.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2021arXiv

Double Categories of Open Dynamical Systems (Extended Abstract)

A (closed) dynamical system is a notion of how things can be, together with a notion of how they may change given how they are. The idea and mathematics of closed dynamical systems has proven incredibly useful in those sciences that can isolate their object of study from its environment. But many changing situations in the world cannot be meaningfully isolated from their environment - a cell will die if it is removed from everything beyond its walls. To study systems that interact with their environment, and to design such systems in a modular way, we need a robust theory of open dynamical systems. In this extended abstract, we put forward a general definition of open dynamical system. We define two general sorts of morphisms between these systems: covariant morphisms which include trajectories, steady states, and periodic orbits; and contravariant morphisms which allow for plugging variables of some systems into parameters of other systems. We define an indexed double category of open dynamical systems indexed by their interface and use a double Grothendieck construction to construct a double category of open dynamical systems. In our main theorem, we construct covariantly representable indexed double functors from the indexed double category of dynamical systems to an indexed double category of spans. This shows that all covariantly representable structures of dynamical systems - including trajectories, steady states, and periodic orbits - compose according to the laws of matrix arithmetic.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Behavioral Mereology (Proofs and Properties)

Mereology is the study of parts and the relationships that hold between them. We introduce a behavioral approach to mereology, in which systems and their parts are known only by the types of behavior they can exhibit. Our discussion is formally topos-theoretic, and agnostic to the topos, providing maximal generality; however, by using only its internal logic we can hide the details and readers may assume a completely elementary set-theoretic discussion. We consider the relationship between various parts of a whole in terms of how behavioral constraints are passed between them, and give an inter-modal logic that generalizes the usual alethic modalities in the setting of symmetric accessibility.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Dirichlet Functors are Contravariant Polynomial Functors

Polynomial functors are sums of covariant representable functors from the category of sets to itself. They have a robust theory with many applications -- from operads and opetopes to combinatorial species. In this paper, we define a contravariant analogue of polynomial functors: Dirichlet functors. We develop the basic theory of Dirichlet functors, and relate them to their covariant analogues.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access