Paper detail

Oracle posterior contraction rates under hierarchical priors

We offer a general Bayes theoretic framework to derive posterior contraction rates under a hierarchical prior design: the first-step prior serves to assess the model selection uncertainty, and the second-step prior quantifies the prior belief on the strength of the signals within the model chosen from the first step. In particular, we establish non-asymptotic oracle posterior contraction rates under (i) a local Gaussianity condition on the log likelihood ratio of the statistical experiment, (ii) a local entropy condition on the dimensionality of the models, and (iii) a sufficient mass condition on the second-step prior near the best approximating signal for each model. The first-step prior can be designed generically. The posterior distribution enjoys Gaussian tail behavior and therefore the resulting posterior mean also satisfies an oracle inequality, automatically serving as an adaptive point estimator in a frequentist sense. Model mis-specification is allowed in these oracle rates. The local Gaussianity condition serves as a unified attempt of non-asymptotic Gaussian quantification of the experiments, and can be easily verified in various experiments considered in [GvdV07a] and beyond. The general results are applied in various problems including: (i) trace regression, (ii) shape-restricted isotonic/convex regression, (iii) high-dimensional partially linear regression, (iv) covariance matrix estimation in the sparse factor model, (v) detection of non-smooth polytopal image boundary, and (vi) intensity estimation in a Poisson point process model. These new results serve either as theoretical justification of practical prior proposals in the literature, or as an illustration of the generic construction scheme of a (nearly) minimax adaptive estimator for a complicated experiment.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.