Paper detail

Optirank: classification for RNA-Seq data with optimal ranking reference genes

Classification algorithms using RNA-Sequencing (RNA-Seq) data as input are used in a variety of biological applications. By nature, RNA-Seq data is subject to uncontrolled fluctuations both within and especially across datasets, which presents a major difficulty for a trained classifier to generalize to an external dataset. Replacing raw gene counts with the rank of gene counts inside an observation has proven effective to mitigate this problem. However, the rank of a feature is by definition relative to all other features, including highly variable features that introduce noise in the ranking. To address this problem and obtain more robust ranks, we propose a logistic regression model, optirank, which learns simultaneously the parameters of the model and the genes to use as a reference set in the ranking. We show the effectiveness of this method on simulated data. We also consider real classification tasks, which present different kinds of distribution shifts between train and test data. Those tasks concern a variety of applications, such as cancer of unknown primary classification, identification of specific gene signatures, and determination of cell type in single-cell RNA-Seq datasets. On those real tasks, optirank performs at least as well as the vanilla logistic regression on classical ranks, while producing sparser solutions. In addition, to increase the robustness against dataset shifts, we propose a multi-source learning scheme and demonstrate its effectiveness when used in combination with rank-based classifiers.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.