Paper detail

Optimum design via I-divergence for stable estimation in generalized regression models

Optimum designs for parameter estimation in generalized regression models are standardly based on the Fisher information matrix (cf. Atkinson et al (2014) for a recent exposition). The corresponding optimality criteria are related to the asymptotic properties of maximal likelihood (ML) estimators in such models. However, in finite sample experiments there could be problems with identifiability, stability and uniqueness of the ML estimate, which are not reflected by the information matrices. In Pázman and Pronzato (2014) is discussed how to solve some of these estimability issues on the design stage of an experiment in standard nonlinear regression. Here we want to extend this design methodology to more general models based on exponential families of distributions (binomial, Poisson, normal with parametrized variances, etc.). The main tool for that is the information (or Kullback-Leibler) divergence, which is closely related to the ML estimation.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.