Paper detail

Optimizing the Zel'dovich Approximation

We have recently learned that the Zeldovich approximation can be successfully used for a far wider range of gravitational instability scenarios than formerly proposed; we study here how to extend this range. In previous work we studied the accuracy of several analytic approximations to gravitational clustering in the mildly nonlinear regime. We found that the ``truncated Zel'dovich approximation" (TZA) was better than any other (except in one case the ordinary Zeldovich approximation) over a wide range from linear to mildly nonlinear ($σ\sim 3$) regimes. TZA sets Fourier amplitudes equal to zero for {\it all} wavenumbers greater than $k_{n\ell}$, where $k_{n\ell}$ marks the transition to the nonlinear regime. Here, we study crosscorrelation of generalized TZA with a group of $n$--body simulations for three shapes of window function: sharp $k$--truncation (as in CMS), tophat in coordinate space, or a Gaussian. We also study the crosscorrelation as a function of initial scale within each window type. We find $k$--truncation, which was so much better than other things tried in CMS, is the {it worst} of these three window shapes. We find that a Gaussian window $e^{-k^2/2k_G^2}$ applied to the intial Fourier amplitudes is the best choice. It produces a greatly improved crosscorrelation all cases we studied. The optimum choice of $k_G$ for the Gaussian window is (spectrum-- dependent) 1--1.5 times $k_{n\ell}$, with $k_{n\ell}$ defined by (3). Although all three windows produce similar power spectra and density distribution functions after application of the Zeldovich approximation, phase agreement with the $n$--body simulation is better for the Gaussian window. We ascribe Gaussian window success to its superior treatment of phase evolution.

preprint1993arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.