Researcher profile

T. F. Pellman

T. F. Pellman contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 11 - Baseline
1works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

1 published item(s)

preprint1993arXiv

Optimizing the Zel'dovich Approximation

We have recently learned that the Zeldovich approximation can be successfully used for a far wider range of gravitational instability scenarios than formerly proposed; we study here how to extend this range. In previous work we studied the accuracy of several analytic approximations to gravitational clustering in the mildly nonlinear regime. We found that the ``truncated Zel'dovich approximation" (TZA) was better than any other (except in one case the ordinary Zeldovich approximation) over a wide range from linear to mildly nonlinear ($σ\sim 3$) regimes. TZA sets Fourier amplitudes equal to zero for {\it all} wavenumbers greater than $k_{n\ell}$, where $k_{n\ell}$ marks the transition to the nonlinear regime. Here, we study crosscorrelation of generalized TZA with a group of $n$--body simulations for three shapes of window function: sharp $k$--truncation (as in CMS), tophat in coordinate space, or a Gaussian. We also study the crosscorrelation as a function of initial scale within each window type. We find $k$--truncation, which was so much better than other things tried in CMS, is the {it worst} of these three window shapes. We find that a Gaussian window $e^{-k^2/2k_G^2}$ applied to the intial Fourier amplitudes is the best choice. It produces a greatly improved crosscorrelation all cases we studied. The optimum choice of $k_G$ for the Gaussian window is (spectrum-- dependent) 1--1.5 times $k_{n\ell}$, with $k_{n\ell}$ defined by (3). Although all three windows produce similar power spectra and density distribution functions after application of the Zeldovich approximation, phase agreement with the $n$--body simulation is better for the Gaussian window. We ascribe Gaussian window success to its superior treatment of phase evolution.