Paper detail

Optimizing Area Under the Curve Measures via Matrix Factorization for Predicting Drug-Target Interaction with Multiple Similarities

In drug discovery, identifying drug-target interactions (DTIs) via experimental approaches is a tedious and expensive procedure. Computational methods efficiently predict DTIs and recommend a small part of potential interacting pairs for further experimental confirmation, accelerating the drug discovery process. Although it has been shown that fusing heterogeneous drug and target similarities can improve the prediction ability, the existing similarity combination methods ignore the interaction consistency for neighbour entities which is more crucial for the DTI prediction model. Furthermore, area under the precision-recall curve (AUPR) that emphasizes the accuracy of top-ranked pairs and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) that heavily punishes the existence of low ranked interacting pairs are two widely used evaluation metrics in DTI prediction. However, the two metrics are seldom considered as losses within existing DTI prediction methods. This paper first proposes two matrix factorization (MF) methods that optimize AUPR and AUC using convex surrogate losses respectively, and then develops an ensemble MF approach takes advantage of the two area under the curve metrics by combining the two single metric based MF models. Both three proposed approaches incorporate a novel local interaction consistency aware similarity interaction method to generate fused drug and target similarities that preserve vital information from the more reliable view. Experimental results over five datasets under different prediction settings show that the proposed methods outperform various competitors in terms of the metric(s) they optimize. In addition, the validation on the top ranked novel predictions confirms the ability of our methods to discover potential new DTIs.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.