Paper detail

Optimization of the Two-Baseline Beta-Beam

We propose a $β$-Beam experiment with four source ions and two baselines for the best possible sensitivity to $θ_{13}$, CP violation and mass hierarchy. Neutrinos from $^{18}$Ne and $^6$He with Lorentz boost $γ=350$ are detected in a 500 kton water \chr detector at a distance L=650 km from the source. Neutrinos from $^8$B and $^8$Li are detected in a 50 kton magnetized iron detector at a distance L=7000 km from the source. Since a tilt angle $\vartheta=34.5^\circ$ is required to send the beam to the magic baseline, the far end of the ring has a maximum depth of $d=2132$ m. We alleviate this problem by proposing to trade reduction of the decay ring with the increase in the boost factor of the $^8$Li and $^8$B ions up to $γ_{^8\mathrm{Li}}=390$ and $γ_{^8\mathrm{Li}}=650$, such that the number of events at the detector remains almost the same. We study the sensitivity reach of this two-baseline two-storage ring $β$-Beam experiment, and compare it with the corresponding reach of the other proposed facilities.

preprint2009arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.