Paper detail

Optimization of the dynamic transition in the continuous coloring problem

Random constraint satisfaction problems can exhibit a phase where the number of constraints per variable $α$ makes the system solvable in theory on the one hand, but also makes the search for a solution hard, meaning that common algorithms such as Monte-Carlo method fail to find a solution. The onset of this hardness is deeply linked to the appearance of a dynamical phase transition where the phase space of the problem breaks into an exponential number of clusters. The exact position of this dynamical phase transition is not universal with respect to the details of the Hamiltonian one chooses to represent a given problem. In this paper, we develop some theoretical tools in order to find a systematic way to build a Hamiltonian that maximizes the dynamic $α_{\rm d}$ threshold. To illustrate our techniques, we will concentrate on the problem of continuous coloring, where one tries to set an angle $x_i \in [0;2π]$ on each node of a network in such a way that no adjacent nodes are closer than some threshold angle $θ$, that is $\cos(x_i - x_j) \leq \cosθ$. This problem can be both seen as a continuous version of the discrete graph coloring problem or as a one-dimensional version of the the Mari-Krzakala-Kurchan (MKK) model. The relevance of this model stems from the fact that continuous constraint satisfaction problems on sparse random graphs remain largely unexplored in statistical physics. We show that for sufficiently small angle $θ$ this model presents a random first order transition and compute the dynamical, condensation and Kesten-Stigum transitions; we also compare the analytical predictions with Monte Carlo simulations for values of $θ= 2π/q$, $q \in \mathbb{N}$. Choosing such values of $q$ allows us to easily compare our results with the renowned problem of discrete coloring.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.