Paper detail

Optimization of FLASH Proton Beams Using a Track-Repeating Algorithm

Methods: A phase space file in a plane at 202 mm downstream of the beam exit window is generated through tuning parameters to match FDC results with measured or MCNPX Monte Carlo-simulated integrated depth-dose distribution (IDD) and lateral dose profiles. To spread out the Bragg peak, widen the beam and reduce the penumbra, a ridge filter (RF), a high-Z material scatterer and a collimator with compensator are inserted in the beam path and their shapes and sizes have been optimized. The FDC calculations are validated by comparing Geant4 Monte Carlo simulations. In addition, a set of algorithms to automatically choose the optimum dimensions of the beam shaping elements is developed and tested using the same beams. At the last part, dose rates for optimized beams were estimated by scaling their dose distributions to that of their original beams. Results: The optimized 86.4 MeV beam had an 8.5 mm wide spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP) (proximal 90% to distal 90% of the maximum dose), 14.5 mm, 12.0 mm and 11.0 lateral widths with dose above 50%, 80% and 90% respectively and a 2.5 mm penumbra from 80% to 20% in the lateral profile for the energy. The 159.5 MeV beam had a SOBP of 39.0 mm and the lateral widths with dose above 50%, 80% and 90% of 20.5 mm, 15.0 and 12.5 mm when the source to surface distance (SSD) was 550 mm. Wider lateral widths was obtained with increased SSD. The FDC calculations had passing rates higher than 96% using 3mm/3% as the gamma-index criterion comparing with Geant4 simulations for both energies. The set of automatic algorithms can choose the proper dimensions for the high-density scatterer, RF, collimator and compensator efficiently. And the optimized 159.5 MeV beam with different SDDs had entrance dose rate higher than 40 Gy/s if the entrance dose rate of the original beam was 150 Gy/s.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.