Paper detail

Optimistic Online Convex Optimization in Dynamic Environments

In this paper, we study the optimistic online convex optimization problem in dynamic environments. Existing works have shown that Ader enjoys an $O\left(\sqrt{\left(1+P_T\right)T}\right)$ dynamic regret upper bound, where $T$ is the number of rounds, and $P_T$ is the path length of the reference strategy sequence. However, Ader is not environment-adaptive. Based on the fact that optimism provides a framework for implementing environment-adaptive, we replace Greedy Projection (GP) and Normalized Exponentiated Subgradient (NES) in Ader with Optimistic-GP and Optimistic-NES respectively, and name the corresponding algorithm ONES-OGP. We also extend the doubling trick to the adaptive trick, and introduce three characteristic terms naturally arise from optimism, namely $M_T$, $\widetilde{M}_T$ and $V_T+1_{L^2ρ\left(ρ+2 P_T\right)\leqslant\varrho^2 V_T}D_T$, to replace the dependence of the dynamic regret upper bound on $T$. We elaborate ONES-OGP with adaptive trick and its subgradient variation version, all of which are environment-adaptive.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.