Paper detail

Optimised hybrid parallelisation of a CFD code on Many Core architectures

COSA is a novel CFD system based on the compressible Navier-Stokes model for unsteady aerodynamics and aeroelasticity of fixed structures, rotary wings and turbomachinery blades. It includes a steady, time domain, and harmonic balance flow solver. COSA has primarily been parallelised using MPI, but there is also a hybrid parallelisation that adds OpenMP functionality to the MPI parallelisation to enable larger number of cores to be utilised for a given simulation as the MPI parallelisation is limited to the number of geometric partitions (or blocks) in the simulation, or to exploit multi-threaded hardware where appropriate. This paper outlines the work undertaken to optimise these two parallelisation strategies, improving the efficiency of both and therefore reducing the computational time required to compute simulations. We also analyse the power consumption of the code on a range of leading HPC systems to further understand the performance of the code.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.