Paper detail

Optimally Weighted PCA for High-Dimensional Heteroscedastic Data

Modern data are increasingly both high-dimensional and heteroscedastic. This paper considers the challenge of estimating underlying principal components from high-dimensional data with noise that is heteroscedastic across samples, i.e., some samples are noisier than others. Such heteroscedasticity naturally arises, e.g., when combining data from diverse sources or sensors. A natural way to account for this heteroscedasticity is to give noisier blocks of samples less weight in PCA by using the leading eigenvectors of a weighted sample covariance matrix. We consider the problem of choosing weights to optimally recover the underlying components. In general, one cannot know these optimal weights since they depend on the underlying components we seek to estimate. However, we show that under some natural statistical assumptions the optimal weights converge to a simple function of the signal and noise variances for high-dimensional data. Surprisingly, the optimal weights are not the inverse noise variance weights commonly used in practice. We demonstrate the theoretical results through numerical simulations and comparisons with existing weighting schemes. Finally, we briefly discuss how estimated signal and noise variances can be used when the true variances are unknown, and we illustrate the optimal weights on real data from astronomy.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.