Paper detail

Optimal spectral norm rates for noisy low-rank matrix completion

In this paper we consider the trace regression model where $n$ entries or linear combinations of entries of an unknown $m_1\times m_2$ matrix $A_0$ corrupted by noise are observed. We establish for the nuclear-norm penalized estimator of $A_0$ introduced in \cite{KLT} a general sharp oracle inequality with the spectral norm for arbitrary values of $n,m_1,m_2$ under an incoherence condition on the sampling distribution $Π$ of the observed entries. Then, we apply this method to the matrix completion problem. In this case, we prove that it satisfies an optimal oracle inequality for the spectral norm, thus improving upon the only existing result \cite{KLT} concerning the spectral norm, which assumes that the sampling distribution is uniform. Note that our result is valid, in particular, in the high-dimensional setting $m_1m_2\gg n$. Finally we show that the obtained rate is optimal up to logarithmic factors in a minimax sense.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.