Paper detail

Optimal orders of the best constants in the Littlewood-Paley inequalities

Let $\{\mathbb{P}_t\}_{t>0}$ be the classical Poisson semigroup on $\mathbb{R}^d$ and $G^{\mathbb{P}}$ the associated Littlewood-Paley $g$-function operator: $$G^{\mathbb{P}}(f)=\Big(\int_0^\infty t|\frac{\partial}{\partial t} \mathbb{P}_t(f)|^2dt\Big)^{\frac12}.$$ The classical Littlewood-Paley $g$-function inequality asserts that for any $1<p<\infty$ there exist two positive constants $\mathsf{L}^{\mathbb{P}}_{t, p}$ and $\mathsf{L}^{\mathbb{P}}_{c, p}$ such that $$ \big(\mathsf{L}^{\mathbb{P}}_{t, p}\big)^{-1}\big\|f\big\|_{p}\le \big\|G^{\mathbb{P}}(f)\big\|_{p} \le \mathsf{L}^{\mathbb{P}}_{c,p}\big\|f\big\|_{p}\,,\quad f\in L_p(\mathbb{R}^d). $$ We determine the optimal orders of magnitude on $p$ of these constants as $p\to1$ and $p\to\infty$. We also consider similar problems for more general test functions in place of the Poisson kernel. The corresponding problem on the Littlewood-Paley dyadic square function inequality is investigated too. Let $Δ$ be the partition of $\mathbb{R}^d$ into dyadic rectangles and $S_R$ the partial sum operator associated to $R$. The dyadic Littlewood-Paley square function of $f$ is $$S^Δ(f)=\Big(\sum_{R\inΔ} |S_R(f)|^2\Big)^{\frac12}.$$ For $1<p<\infty$ there exist two positive constants $\mathsf{L}^Δ_{c,p, d}$ and $ \mathsf{L}^Δ_{t,p, d}$ such that $$ \big(\mathsf{L}^Δ_{t,p, d}\big)^{-1}\big\|f\big\|_{p}\le \big\|S^Δ(f)\big\|_{p}\le \mathsf{L}^Δ_{c,p, d}\big\|f\big\|_{p},\quad f\in L_p(\mathbb{R}^d). $$ We show that $$\mathsf{L}^Δ_{t,p, d}\approx_d (\mathsf{L}^Δ_{t,p, 1})^d\;\text{ and }\; \mathsf{L}^Δ_{c,p, d}\approx_d (\mathsf{L}^Δ_{c,p, 1})^d.$$ All the previous results can be equally formulated for the $d$-torus $\mathbb{T}^d$. We prove a de Leeuw type transference principle in the vector-valued setting.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.