Paper detail

Optimal materials for maximum near-field radiative heat transfer

We consider the space of all causal bulk materials, 2D materials, and metamaterials for maximum near-field radiative heat transfer (RHT). Causality constrains the bandwidth over which plasmonic response can occur, explaining two key traits in ideal materials: small background permittivities (minimal high-energy transitions in 2D materials), and Drude-like free-carrier response, which together optimally yield 10X enhancements beyond the theoretical state-of-the-art. We identify transparent conducting oxides, III-Nitrides, and graphene as materials that should offer nearly ideal near-field RHT rates, if doped to exhibit plasmonic resonances at what we term "near-field Wien frequencies." Deep-subwavelength patterning can provide marginal further gains, at the expense of extremely small feature sizes. Optimal materials have moderate loss rates and plasmonic response at 19 μm for 300K temperature, suggesting a new opportunity for plasmonics at mid- to far-infrared wavelengths, with low carrier concentrations and no requirement to minimize loss.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.