Paper detail

Optimal hypothesis testing for high dimensional covariance matrices

This paper considers testing a covariance matrix $Σ$ in the high dimensional setting where the dimension $p$ can be comparable or much larger than the sample size $n$. The problem of testing the hypothesis $H_0:Σ=Σ_0$ for a given covariance matrix $Σ_0$ is studied from a minimax point of view. We first characterize the boundary that separates the testable region from the non-testable region by the Frobenius norm when the ratio between the dimension $p$ over the sample size $n$ is bounded. A test based on a $U$-statistic is introduced and is shown to be rate optimal over this asymptotic regime. Furthermore, it is shown that the power of this test uniformly dominates that of the corrected likelihood ratio test (CLRT) over the entire asymptotic regime under which the CLRT is applicable. The power of the $U$-statistic based test is also analyzed when $p/n$ is unbounded.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.