Paper detail

Optimal grouping of arbitrary diagrammatic expansions via analytic pole structure

We present a general method to optimize the evaluation of Feynman diagrammatic expansions, which requires the automated symbolic assignment of momentum/energy conserving variables to each diagram. With this symbolic representation, we utilize the pole structure of each diagram to automatically sort the Feynman diagrams into groups that are likely to contain nearly equal or nearly cancelling diagrams, and we show that for some systems this cancellation is exact. This allows for a potentially massive cancellation during the numerical integration of internal momenta variables, leading to an optimal suppression of the `sign problem' and hence reducing the computational cost. Although we define these groups using a frequency space representation, the equality or cancellation of diagrams within the group remains valid in other representations such as imaginary time used in standard diagrammatic Monte Carlo. As an application of the approach we apply this method, combined with algorithmic Matsubara integration (AMI) [Phys. Rev. B 99, 035120 (2019)] and Monte Carlo methods, to the Hubbard model self-energy expansion on a 2D square lattice up to sixth order which we evaluate and compare with existing benchmarks.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.