Paper detail

Optimal error estimate for semi-implicit space-time discretization for the equations describing incompressible generalized Newtonian fluids

In this paper we study the numerical error arising in the space-time approximation of unsteady generalized Newtonian fluids which possess a stress-tensor with $(p,δ)$-structure. A semi-implicit time-discretization scheme coupled with conforming inf-sup stable finite element space discretization is analyzed. The main result, which improves previous suboptimal estimates as those in [A. Prohl, and M. Ruzicka, SIAM J. Numer. Anal., 39 (2001), pp. 214--249] is the optimal $O(k+h)$ error-estimate valid in the range $p\in (3/2,2]$, where $k$ and $h$ are the time-step and the mesh-size, respectively. Our results hold in three-dimensional domains (with periodic boundary conditions) and are uniform with respect to the degeneracy parameter $\in [0,δ_0]$ of the extra stress tensor.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.