Paper detail

Optimal Design of Distributed Energy Systems Considering the Impacts on Electrical Power Networks

Distributed energy systems (DES) have the potential to minimise costly network upgrades while increasing the proportion of renewable energy generation in the electrical grid, when properly designed. In contrast, poorly designed DES can accelerate the degeneration of existing network infrastructure. Most optimisation models used to design grid-connected DES have oversimplified or excluded constraints associated with alternating current (AC) power flow, as the latter has been studied in a standalone class of models known as Optimal Power Flow (OPF). A small subset of models, labelled DES-OPF models, have attempted to combine these independent frameworks. However, the impacts of using a DES-OPF framework on the resulting designs, as opposed to a conventional DES framework without AC power flow, have not been studied in previous work. This study aims to shed light on these impacts by proposing a bi-level method to solve the computationally-expensive DES-OPF framework, and simultaneously comparing results to a baseline MILP model that utilises direct current (DC) approximations in place of AC OPF, as found abundantly in literature. Two test cases of varying scale are employed to test the frameworks and compare resulting designs. The practical feasibility of the designs is assessed, based on whether the designs can mitigate network violations and energy wastage during standard operation. Results demonstrate that the baseline MILP underestimates total costs due to its inability to detect current and voltage violations, resulting in a 37% increase for one case study when tested with the DES-OPF framework. Major implications on battery capacity are also observed, primarily to manage higher levels of renewable energy curtailment, which emphasise the need to use DES-OPF frameworks when designing grid-connected DES.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.