BZPEERPapers, people, evidence and research paths
Menu

Discover

SearchFind papers, people, topics, institutions and opportunities from one place.GraphSee how papers, authors, topics and evidence connect.

Research tools

HomeContinue from the papers, people and topics that matter now.CollectionsTurn saved papers into reading lists, evidence maps and shareable context.ResearchReconstruct the path that led you from search to paper to question.CollaborationMove from a paper, topic or expert request into a focused thread.PublishCreate full-text research articles with metadata, formulas and versions.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists whose work and reviews explain why they can help.CommunitiesJoin research groups organized around papers, topics and shared evidence.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations connected to real research context.

Account

Log inReturn to your saved papers, graph views and active threads.Create accountStart saving papers, building a research trail and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Source author record

Oleksiy V. Klymenko

Oleksiy V. Klymenko appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record
math.OC

Catalog footprint

What is connected

2works
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Log in to claim
Open graphBrowse works

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Complementarity Reformulations for the Optimal Design of Distributed Energy Systems with Multiphase Optimal Power Flow

The design of grid-connected distributed energy systems (DES) has been investigated extensively as an optimisation problem in the past, but most studies do not include nonlinear constraints associated with unbalanced alternating current (AC) power flow in distribution networks. Previous studies that do consider AC power flow use either less complex balanced formulations applicable to transmission networks, or iterative linearisations derived from local power flow solutions and prior knowledge of the design. To address these limitations, this study proposes a new algorithm for obtaining DES design decisions subject to nonlinear power flow models. The use of regularised complementarity reformulations for operational constraints that contain binary variables is proposed. This allows the use of large-scale nonlinear solvers that can find locally optimal solutions, eliminating the need for linearisations and prior knowledge while improving accuracy. DES design models with either multiphase optimal power flow (MOPF), which captures inherent phase imbalances present in distribution networks, or balanced optimal power flow formulations (OPF) are tested using a modified version of the unbalanced IEEE EU low-voltage network. Results are compared with a popular linear DES design framework, which proposes an infeasible operational schedule when tested with MOPF, while the fixed design alone produces the highest annualised costs. Despite the increased complexity, DES with MOPF obtains the best solution, enabling a greater integration of solar capacity and reducing total annualised cost when compared to DES with OPF. The new algorithm achieves a 19% improvement when compared with solving a bi-level model for DES with OPF, where the entire binary topology in the nonlinear model is fixed. The study therefore enables the acquisition of DES designs that can work symbiotically within distribution networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Optimal Design of Distributed Energy Systems Considering the Impacts on Electrical Power Networks

Distributed energy systems (DES) have the potential to minimise costly network upgrades while increasing the proportion of renewable energy generation in the electrical grid, when properly designed. In contrast, poorly designed DES can accelerate the degeneration of existing network infrastructure. Most optimisation models used to design grid-connected DES have oversimplified or excluded constraints associated with alternating current (AC) power flow, as the latter has been studied in a standalone class of models known as Optimal Power Flow (OPF). A small subset of models, labelled DES-OPF models, have attempted to combine these independent frameworks. However, the impacts of using a DES-OPF framework on the resulting designs, as opposed to a conventional DES framework without AC power flow, have not been studied in previous work. This study aims to shed light on these impacts by proposing a bi-level method to solve the computationally-expensive DES-OPF framework, and simultaneously comparing results to a baseline MILP model that utilises direct current (DC) approximations in place of AC OPF, as found abundantly in literature. Two test cases of varying scale are employed to test the frameworks and compare resulting designs. The practical feasibility of the designs is assessed, based on whether the designs can mitigate network violations and energy wastage during standard operation. Results demonstrate that the baseline MILP underestimates total costs due to its inability to detect current and voltage violations, resulting in a 37% increase for one case study when tested with the DES-OPF framework. Major implications on battery capacity are also observed, primarily to manage higher levels of renewable energy curtailment, which emphasise the need to use DES-OPF frameworks when designing grid-connected DES.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access