Paper detail

OptGAN: Optimizing and Interpreting the Latent Space of the Conditional Text-to-Image GANs

Text-to-image generation intends to automatically produce a photo-realistic image, conditioned on a textual description. It can be potentially employed in the field of art creation, data augmentation, photo-editing, etc. Although many efforts have been dedicated to this task, it remains particularly challenging to generate believable, natural scenes. To facilitate the real-world applications of text-to-image synthesis, we focus on studying the following three issues: 1) How to ensure that generated samples are believable, realistic or natural? 2) How to exploit the latent space of the generator to edit a synthesized image? 3) How to improve the explainability of a text-to-image generation framework? In this work, we constructed two novel data sets (i.e., the Good & Bad bird and face data sets) consisting of successful as well as unsuccessful generated samples, according to strict criteria. To effectively and efficiently acquire high-quality images by increasing the probability of generating Good latent codes, we use a dedicated Good/Bad classifier for generated images. It is based on a pre-trained front end and fine-tuned on the basis of the proposed Good & Bad data set. After that, we present a novel algorithm which identifies semantically-understandable directions in the latent space of a conditional text-to-image GAN architecture by performing independent component analysis on the pre-trained weight values of the generator. Furthermore, we develop a background-flattening loss (BFL), to improve the background appearance in the edited image. Subsequently, we introduce linear interpolation analysis between pairs of keywords. This is extended into a similar triangular `linguistic' interpolation in order to take a deep look into what a text-to-image synthesis model has learned within the linguistic embeddings. Our data set is available at https://zenodo.org/record/6283798#.YhkN_ujMI2w.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.