Paper detail

Opportunities and challenges in the use of heavily doped polycrystalline silicon as a thermoelectric material. An experimental study

Large-volume deployment of Si-based Seebeck generators can be foreseen only if polycrystalline rather than single crystalline materials can be actually used. The aim of this study was therefore to verify whether polycrystalline Si films deposited on top of a SiO$_2$ insulating layer can develop interesting thermoelectric power factors. We prepared 450-nm thick heavily boron doped polysilicon layers, setting the initial boron content in the film to be in excess of the boron solubility in polycrystalline silicon at 1000 °C. Isochronal thermal annealings were then used to modify the B$_{Si}$ content by precipitation. Quite unexpectedly, a concurrent increase of the thermoelectric power and of the conductivity was observed for heat treatments at temperatures above 800 °C. Upon annealing at 1000 °C we found a power factor $P$ of 13 mW K$^{-2}$ m$^{-1}$, more than three times higher than previously reported $P$ for Si nanowires. These findings could be explained observing that degenerate polysilicon displays a remarkable enhancement of its Seebeck coefficient as an effect of the large amount of boron it can dissolve. Band gap narrowing and band tailing modify the density of states around the Fermi energy leading to a dramatic improvement of its log-derivative in the Mott equation. These results apparently point out an interesting direction for the development of Seebeck and Peltier devices sharing low cost and relatively high efficiency.

preprint2010arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.