Paper detail

Operator backflow and the classical simulation of quantum transport

Tensor product states have proved extremely powerful for simulating the area-law entangled states of many-body systems, such as the ground states of gapped Hamiltonians in one dimension. The applicability of such methods to the \emph{dynamics} of many-body systems is less clear: the memory required grows exponentially in time in most cases, quickly becoming unmanageable. New methods reduce the memory required by selectively discarding/dissipating parts of the many-body wavefunction which are expected to have little effect on the hydrodynamic observables typically of interest: for example, some methods discard fine-grained correlations associated with $n$-point functions, with $n$ exceeding some cutoff $\ell_*$. In this work, we present a theory for the sizes of `backflow corrections', i.e., systematic errors due to discarding this fine-grained information. In particular, we focus on their effect on transport coefficients. Our results suggest that backflow corrections are exponentially suppressed in the size of the cutoff $\ell_*$. Moreover, the backflow errors themselves have a hydrodynamical expansion, which we elucidate. We test our predictions against numerical simulations run on random unitary circuits and ergodic spin-chains. These results lead to the conjecture that transport coefficients in ergodic diffusive systems can be captured to a given precision $ε$ with an amount of memory scaling as $\exp[\mathcal{O}(\log(ε)^2)]$, significantly better than the naive estimate of memory $\exp[\mathcal{O}(\mathrm{poly}(ε^{-1}))]$ required by more brute-force methods.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.