Paper detail

Operation of a Brain-Computer Interface Walking Simulator by Users with Spinal Cord Injury

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) can leave the affected individuals unable to ambulate. Since there are no restorative treatments for SCI, novel approaches such as brain-controlled prostheses have been sought. Our recent studies show that a brain-computer interface (BCI) can be used to control ambulation within a virtual reality environment (VRE), suggesting that a BCI-controlled lower extremity prosthesis for ambulation may be feasible. However, the operability of our BCI has not been tested in a SCI population. Methods: Five subjects with paraplegia or tetraplegia due to SCI underwent a 10-min training session in which they alternated between kinesthetic motor imagery (KMI) of idling and walking while their electroencephalogram (EEG) were recorded. Subjects then performed a goal-oriented online task, where they utilized KMI to control the linear ambulation of an avatar and make 10 sequential stops at designated points within the VRE. Multiple online trials were performed over 5 experimental days. Results: Classification accuracy of idling and walking was estimated offline and ranged from 60.5% (p=0.0176) to 92.3% (p=1.36*10^-20) across subjects and days. In the online task, all subjects achieved purposeful control with an average performance of 7.4 +/- 2.3 successful stops in 273 +/- 51 sec (p<0.01). All subjects maintained purposeful control throughout the study, and their online performances improved over time. Conclusions: The results demonstrate that SCI subjects can purposefully operate a self-paced BCI walking simulator to complete a goal-oriented ambulation task. The operation of this BCI system requires short training, is intuitive, and robust against subject-to-subject and day-to-day neurophysiological variations. These findings indicate that BCI-controlled lower extremity prostheses for gait rehabilitation or restoration after SCI may be feasible in the future.

preprint2012arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.