Paper detail

Openness of Regular Regimes of Complex Random Matrix Models

Consider the general complex polynomial external field $$ V(z)=\frac{z^{k}}{k}+\sum_{j=1}^{k-1} \frac{t_j z^j}{j}, \qquad t_j \in \mathbb{C}, \quad k \in \mathbb{N}. $$ Fix an equivalence class $\mathcal{T}$ of admissible contours whose members approach $\infty$ in two different directions and consider the associated max-min energy problem. When $k=2p$, $p \in \mathbb{N}$, and $\mathcal{T}$ contains the real axis, we show that the set of parameters $t_1, \cdots, t_{2p-1}$ which gives rise to a regular $q$-cut max-min (equilibrium) measure, $1 \leq q \leq 2p-1 $, is an open set in $\mathbb{C}^{2p-1}$. We use the implicit function theorem to prove that the endpoint equations are solvable in a small enough neighborhood of a regular $q$-cut point. We also establish the real-analyticity of the real and imaginary parts of the end-points for all $q$-cut regimes, $1 \leq q \leq 2p-1$, with respect to the real and imaginary parts of the complex parameters in the external field. Our choice of even $k$ and the equivalence class $\mathcal{T} \ni \mathbb{R}$ of admissible contours is only for the simplicity of exposition and our proof extends to all possible choices in an analogous way.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.