Paper detail

Open-plan Glare Evaluator (OGE): A Demonstration of a New Glare Prediction Approach Using Machine Learning Algorithms

Predicting discomfort glare in open-plan offices is a challenging problem. Although glare research has existed for more than 50 years, all current glare metrics have accuracy limitations, especially in open-plan offices with low lighting levels. Thus, it is crucial to develop a new method to predict glare more accurately. This paper is the first to adopt Machine Learning (ML) approaches in the prediction of glare. This research aims to demonstrate the validity of this approach by comparing the accuracy of the new ML model for open-plan offices (OGE) to the accuracy of the existing glare metrics using local dataset. To utilize and test this approach, Post-Occupancy Evaluation (POE) and High Dynamic Range (HDR) images were collected from 80 occupants (n=80) in four different open-plan offices in Brisbane, Australia. Consequently, various multi-region luminance values, luminance, and glare indices were calculated and examined as input features to train ML models. The accuracy of the ML model was compared to the accuracy of 24 indices which were also evaluated using a Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) analysis to identify the best cutoff values (thresholds) for each index in open-plan configurations. Results showed that the ML approach could predict glare with an accuracy of 83.8% (0.80 true positive rate and 0.86 true negative rate), which outperformed the accuracy of the previously developed glare metrics. OGE is applicable for open-plan office situations with low vertical illuminance (200 to 600 lux). However, ML models can be trained with more substantial datasets to achieve global model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access6 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.