Paper detail

Open Domain Question Answering Using Web Tables

Tables extracted from web documents can be used to directly answer many web search queries. Previous works on question answering (QA) using web tables have focused on factoid queries, i.e., those answerable with a short string like person name or a number. However, many queries answerable using tables are non-factoid in nature. In this paper, we develop an open-domain QA approach using web tables that works for both factoid and non-factoid queries. Our key insight is to combine deep neural network-based semantic similarity between the query and the table with features that quantify the dominance of the table in the document as well as the quality of the information in the table. Our experiments on real-life web search queries show that our approach significantly outperforms state-of-the-art baseline approaches. Our solution is used in production in a major commercial web search engine and serves direct answers for tens of millions of real user queries per month.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.