Paper detail

Online Self-Calibration for Visual-Inertial Navigation Systems: Models, Analysis and Degeneracy

In this paper, we study in-depth the problem of online self-calibration for robust and accurate visual-inertial state estimation. In particular, we first perform a complete observability analysis for visual-inertial navigation systems (VINS) with full calibration of sensing parameters, including IMU and camera intrinsics and IMU-camera spatial-temporal extrinsic calibration, along with readout time of rolling shutter (RS) cameras (if used). We investigate different inertial model variants containing IMU intrinsic parameters that encompass most commonly used models for low-cost inertial sensors. The observability analysis results prove that VINS with full sensor calibration has four unobservable directions, corresponding to the system's global yaw and translation, while all sensor calibration parameters are observable given fully-excited 6-axis motion. Moreover, we, for the first time, identify primitive degenerate motions for IMU and camera intrinsic calibration. Each degenerate motion profile will cause a set of calibration parameters to be unobservable and any combination of these degenerate motions are still degenerate. Extensive Monte-Carlo simulations and real-world experiments are performed to validate both the observability analysis and identified degenerate motions, showing that online self-calibration improves system accuracy and robustness to calibration inaccuracies. We compare the proposed online self-calibration on commonly-used IMUs against the state-of-art offline calibration toolbox Kalibr, and show that the proposed system achieves better consistency and repeatability. Based on our analysis and experimental evaluations, we also provide practical guidelines for how to perform online IMU-camera sensor self-calibration.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.